https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- "(a = 0) != 0" has a side effect of setting a to 0. I think in this case, clang is incorrectly warning about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- "(a = 0) != 0" has a side effect of setting a to 0. I think in this case, clang is incorrectly warning about it.