https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > Almost certainly r217066. > > Is this a newlib target? Yes. > I would expect to see the same failure for all > newlib targets, as I defined std::ctype_base::blank to be equal to > std::ctype_base::space for newlib (and any libc where I couldn't determine > the right bitmask for the [:blank:] character class) and the [:space:] class > includes newline. What I meant by "Unexpectedly, I don't see this for other non-linux and/or "newlib" targets with libstdc++ results posted to gcc-testresults@", is that I couldn't find that which you (and I) expected. Though, not many posted "newlib" targets test-results include libstdc++ results. Trying to build one myself (one where I didn't also write the port) but alas previously trusted targets such as arm-eabi and powerpc-eabisim break left and right (building or massive test failures). Bah.
