https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |davem at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you contribute something other than a knee-jerk reactionary posting of that
submission rules URL?
Those requirements are entirely impractical. I checked things in directly to
the gcc repo because a sparc gcc-4.9 build failure persisted for 9 months,
which is proof that this proceedure for sanitizer development is completely not
tenable.
A sanitizer developer was CC:'d on the gcc bugzilla in question, and I even
posted a working version of that developers patch and attached it to that bug.
Nothing was done for 4 months after that.
After consulting with Richard Henderson I just checked it in.
And I will continue to do the same in the future, I apologize in advance if
fixing the build in gcc after waiting for upstream to do something about it for
months upsets you.
