https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
--- Comment #3 from Blaine Bell <blaine at blainebell dot org> --- thanks for the quick response, much appreciated. To be honest, I really don't understand this post/FAQ. Looking at these examples, I do not see any ambiguity. This problem seems to be the compiler implementation, and not defining the operator priority or sequence of commands, even though it seems straight forward *if* the language is executed left-to-right. For example: i++ * i++ : simply multiply i by i+1, where the value of i is i+2 afterwards. i = i++ : same as i++ a[i] = i++ : set a[i] to i, then increment i The real problem is that the logic of the ++ operator is suppose to increment the actual variable values, but the compiler tries to optimize and increment the temporary variable created by a function call instead. I am not completely familiar with the language specifications, but would appreciate more pointers if you have them. Thanks again, Blaine
