https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #22 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #21) > True, we could also follow this approach again > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333#c55), but it's more of a > hack really. There isn't any notations upstream that indicate that original problem with inaccurate results from ___divdc3 was fixed in compiler-rt... http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9150
