https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Stupachenko Evgeny from comment #43) > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #42) > > > --- Comment #41 from Stupachenko Evgeny <evstupac at gmail dot com> --- > > > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40) > > [...] > > > That should be not "EBX enablig" issue as pointed in comments 17 and 35. > > > I'm testing bootstrap like in comment 34 and it passed. > > > > Adding --with-arch=core2 --with-cpu=core2 didn't make any difference. > > > > Rainer > > The core thing in comment 34 is "patch in comment 33 applied on top of > r216304". > > Most likely after r216304 someone broke darwin bootstrap again. > So to test my changes I use revision r216304 with patch from commnet 33. there were at one point this week 4 concurrent bootstrap breaks on dariwn. this PR. the ipa-icf series requiring non-weak aliases and the iconv dep on libcpp. I don't know how many of those have been fixed so far - but I suspect that not all have. Unfortunately, not able to be more explict right now.
