https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00375.html

Gerald objected to the patch saying the dumb macros should be defined for C++98
mode or it will break code. Not sure I agree, but I'll adjust the patch to only
define them when __cplusplus < 201103L

Reply via email to