https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Agustín Bergé from comment #15) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) > > Agustin, do you have a copyright assignment? > > I do not have one. The attached <tuple> is derived from libstdc++'s <tuple> > and I have left the license in place, wouldn't that be enough? No. You are free to release your derived work under the terms of the GPL, but that is not sufficient for the code to be accepted into the FSF repository. > I did not > intend for the attachment to be a patch (it is not a patch, I did not > consider coding styles, I did not run tests, etc), but merely a proof of > concept implementation so that others could measure the compile-time > performance win of a flat implementation. And that's fine. But to respond to Manu in comment 11 and comment 13, we need more than just a review, since the proof of concept attached here cannot be used without the usual legal prerequisites being met. Another option would be for someone else to provide a flat implementation, but again that is more than just a review.
