https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63446
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7) > IIRC we don't, and the file contains a comment saying that it would be > expensive. Actually, properly limiting the maximal depth of the walk (as is > done in several other passes) would make it cheap enough and we should > probably do it. I hope so. You may even fix PR19430 in the process, which is one of the oldest PRs we have!
