https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35545
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35545 > > --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- > This feels like the kind of situation where I've always wanted a pass to be > able to say something like "I've done some set of transformations", schedule > the appropriate cleanup passes to run". > > It's heavyweight, but making the tracer imply a later DOM or VRP pass might > make sense. Uh that idea will lead to very big compile-time increases. One thing I'd liked to do at some point is make the SSA propagators and/or DOM work on MEME regions so we can schedule them on a sub-CFG. Richard.
