https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Dmitry Petrov <dmitry.petroff at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Petrov <dmitry.petroff at gmail dot com> ---
Jakub, so you telling that different behaviour of gcc and g++ is ok in this
case? With gcc inline + gnu_inline does not yields undefined references.
And before you advice me to not use such constructions in my code, please note
that problem appears in gperf output. So people have to use ugly #undef
workarounds or even more ugly sed tricks or just don't use gperf's C output
with g++ when debugging.
And I'm sorry to be that insistent but
>G++ 4.3 was the first release to support gnu_inline attribute in C++
is not true: g++-4.1 supported gnu_inline at some point:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2007-September/msg00089.html
