https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091

--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> Honza - these should always be gcc_checking_assert ()s - there is no need to
> ICE (and in fact it shouldn't even be a gcc_checking_assert in any tree but
> yours used for testing).

Yep, I plan to remove the old intraprocedural code very soon - I am basically
looking for testcases like these.  I went through firefox/testsuite/Qt builds
myself, but wanted to know if there are more side cases.

Honza

Reply via email to