https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #8) > Richard, > > I tested both proposed fixes and i turned out that the first one is > preferable since performance of benchmark came back. Note that hoisting 2nd > vrp pass gave us another 14% slowdown but I did not investigate it. > > Should I tested your fix or you do it yourself? I'd like to explore on how to make it a little more "generic", it's a very special hack as-is. > Thanks.
