https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49366
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #1) > Any idea what value it should have? (how GDB would like to have the member > function pointer encoded) Sorry I didn't reply to this sooner. Nope, no idea :-) I think whatever is done here will need a corresponding gdb patch.
