https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jun 25 14:27:35 2014 New Revision: 211981 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211981&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-06-25 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> DR 178 PR c++/49132 * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Do not complain about uninitialized const members, because within aggregate-initialization, members without explicit initializers are value-initialized. /testsuite 2014-06-25 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> DR 178 PR c++/49132 * g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C: New. * g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr2.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/init/aggr11.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/init/aggr12.C: Likewise. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr2.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr11.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr12.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/typeck2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
