http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567

--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #14)
> It doesn't seem to make sense to keep function
> but optimize out the thunk as we would do now (even w/o LTO)

Right.  When we emit a function, we need to also emit any associated thunks.

Reply via email to