http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60778
Bug ID: 60778 Summary: shift not folded into shift on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sunfish at mozilla dot com On this C code: double mem[4096]; double foo(long x) { return mem[x>>3]; } GCC emits this x86-64 code: sarq $3, %rdi movsd mem(,%rdi,8), %xmm0 The following x86-64 code would be preferrable: andq $-8, %rdi movsd mem(%rdi), %xmm0 since it has smaller code size, and avoids using a scaled index which costs an extra micro-op on some microarchitectures. The same situation arrises on 32-bit x86 also. This was observed on all GCC versions currently on the GCC Explorer website [0], with the latest at this time being 4.9.0 20130909. [0] http://gcc.godbolt.org/