http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Yes, this testcase works better with -fno-var-tracking-assignments. That's expected for the param-[123].c testcases. > It seems to be a mixed bag, though. Running the testsuite with this > argument causes 79 previously failing guality tests to pass, but > causes 200 more new failures. Yes, both modes have severe limitations. > I wonder if there's some way to get the best of both worlds? That's what I have been trying to do recently for these testcases: selectively shut down -fvar-tracking-assignments to track the location instead of the value, because it's for aggregate parameters and they are rarely modified. I'll investigate why this isn't sufficient on aarch64.
