http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638
--- Comment #20 from Lucia Huang <eving.tw at gmail dot com> --- Hi Andrew: We use gcc as preprocessor to extand header files for C code. It is used in a script to parse and check for error in a large code base (6000+ files). Not all headers are needed to be extanded. As the code base is large, creating dummy files for the missing header is not a good plan. So far we force the script to run with older version gcc. Thanks, Lucia On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:11 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15638 > > --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Lucia Huang from comment #17) > > Hi, > > Is there an option to revert this change? To generate an error or > warning > > for a missing header? Thanks. > > What is the use case for having this as a non fatal error? I cannot think > of > one. The main reason why is a fatal error is due missing an include will > cause > cascading errors latter on. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
