http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Ok, we do need the post-dominators to avoid FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr21463.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times phiopt1 "MIN_ EXPR" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr21463.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times phiopt1 "MAX_ EXPR" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr21463.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times phiopt1 "MIN_ EXPR" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr21463.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times phiopt1 "MAX_ EXPR" 2 FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr57380.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump phiopt1 "MAX_EXPR" FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr57380.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump phiopt1 "MAX_EXPR" Re-testing that variant.