[Bug c++/59886] [4.9 Regression] C++ array init optimization results in RANGE_EXPRs in assignments

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59886

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Even the const there isn't needed.

Anyway, the bug I think is that split_nonconstant_init_1 doesn't handle
RANGE_EXPR field_index in the if (TREE_CODE (value) == CONSTRUCTOR) case
(it handles it in the else if (!initializer_constant_valid_p (value,
inner_type))
case).