http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59747

--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> You don't have the r206659 fix in your tree, do you?

No. I thought to have tested it as said at the end of comment 12, but it seems
that I did not actually do it. Importing r206659 in my working tree made the
test succeeds.

Sorry for the noise.

Reply via email to