http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59747
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > You don't have the r206659 fix in your tree, do you? No. I thought to have tested it as said at the end of comment 12, but it seems that I did not actually do it. Importing r206659 in my working tree made the test succeeds. Sorry for the noise.