http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > It could be due to r205679: > > Very likely. This obviously wasn't tested at all ... which implies that the GCC testsuite needs to be improved with regards to LTO testing as there was no new failure with the patch. > I don't remember reviewing this LTO change nor approving it. Well ... Jakub did on 4 Dec 2013. However, given that the patch was initially posted on 24 Nov 2013 and the nearly unmodified initial version already on 9 Nov 2013, you had plenty of time to look at the patch ...
