http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > > For the record: The code that I'm proposing to remove in comment 4 has been > > added by Paul in r105913: > > For PR24158 (ice-on-invalid-code), which was on 2005-10-26. Btw: The corresponding test cases are derived_recursion.f90 implicit_actual.f90 The patch does not change the diagnostics for these cases (in particular there is no 'confusing knock-on).
