http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Bug ID: 59535 Summary: [4.9 regression] -Os code size regressions for Thumb1/Thumb2 (with LRA)? Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com, vmakarov at redhat dot com, yvan.roux at linaro dot org Target: arm Running the CSiBE benchmark for -Os with Thumb1 and Thumb2 code generation shows significant regressions since 11/12/13 (the day LRA was turned on by default for ARM). These cause code size to grow back to the size it was in 2011. I'll try to find some simple examples to use as test cases.