http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59411
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #1) > One should check the > Fortran standard for restrictions in the case of C_PTRs (which, strictly > speaking, are no actual pointers in the Fortran sense). Since C_PTR is a derived type in the Fortran sense, I don't see why any restrictions on pointer init should apply. Unless there are any special restrictions for C_PTR, the code should be valid, just as the corresponding code with any other derived type: module m implicit none type :: t end type type(t), parameter :: pp = t() type(t), parameter :: p2 = pp end module m
