http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359

--- Comment #12 from Anatoly Sinyavin <a.sinyavin at samsung dot com> ---
Does it mean that my solution is not accepted? 

If it's so I am going to think about two approaches
    - vectorizer should ignore that path (Richard Biener 2013-09-09 08:22:53
UTC)
    - replacing the GIMPLE_COND, leading to a block that contains only 
    a call to __builtin_unreachable, with an ASSERT_EXPR, or range information
on this SSA_NAME (now that we store it), or anything without control flow (Marc
Glisse 2013-10-24 12:03:18 UTC)

Reply via email to