http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56807
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yeah, the issue is the use of frame-pointer ... instead we should use here stack-pointer relative addressing as we are that way realigned stack-pointer agnostic. Following patch solves the issue. Could you give it a try? Index: i386.c =================================================================== --- i386.c (Revision 205719) +++ i386.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -10934,18 +10934,21 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) } m->fs.sp_offset += allocate; + /* Use stack_pointer_rtx for relative addressing so that code + works for realigned stack, too. */ if (r10_live && eax_live) { - t = choose_baseaddr (m->fs.sp_offset - allocate); + t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, 0 - allocate); emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, R10_REG), gen_frame_mem (word_mode, t)); - t = choose_baseaddr (m->fs.sp_offset - allocate - UNITS_PER_WORD); + t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, + 0 - allocate - UNITS_PER_WORD); emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, AX_REG), gen_frame_mem (word_mode, t)); } else if (eax_live || r10_live) { - t = choose_baseaddr (m->fs.sp_offset - allocate); + t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, 0 - allocate); emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, (eax_live ? AX_REG : R10_REG)), gen_frame_mem (word_mode, t));