http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59215
--- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Oleg Smolsky from comment #12) > Hey Kostya, should I try suppressing the report using the function name? > Would it work in optimized builds that have inlining? Excellent question! If you build with -g (at least with clang; -gline-tables-only is ok too) our symbolizer (llvm-symbolizer) is able to recognize the inlined frame and then the suppression should work even if the function got inlined. But this is sort or fragile -- I still don't believe it works :) And it won't work w/o debug info or if debug info is broken for any reason. So the best solution is still to fix the libstdc++ code. :(
