http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > And the problem with that is? Because the arithmetics is based on the value > we've read, it shouldn't be a problem. Ah...right. > That said, during stage3 I'll look at how costly would be to use there > __atomic_load_n with MEMMODEL_RELAXED. Thanks!