http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194

--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> And the problem with that is?  Because the arithmetics is based on the value
> we've read, it shouldn't be a problem.

Ah...right. 

> That said, during stage3 I'll look at how costly would be to use there
> __atomic_load_n with MEMMODEL_RELAXED.

Thanks!

Reply via email to