http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #14) > I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to > pick the latter one if that's true. > Also add a comment denoting this is a dirty workaround. > On Nov 13, 2013 9:38 PM, "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" < > gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 > > > > --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> --- > > (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #12) > > > That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works. > > > > Linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,CoreFoundation for gcc trunk at > > r204750 > > suppresses all of the failures in asan.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin12. > > Retesting > > with -Wl,-framework,Foundation. > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > The Foundation framework is already linked against the CoreFoundation framework. I've confirmed that linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,Foundation alone (as is done by llvm) is sufficient to suppress the asan.exp failures. This change will duplicate the linkage used by llvm for the asan shared library. Posted proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01499.html,
