http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58621
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Your suggested optimization would be invalid if .LANCHOR0 had the address 0x?????????????FFC, whereupon adding 4 would wrap the offset component but not the base component in x0.