http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58358
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> --- Thanks a lot Chris. Sorry if I bother you for a few minutes more: when you say "doing away with skipping optimizations altogether", you mean, essentially, using the algorithm we have got now for forward iterators? Which is also, if I remember correctly, what we had earlier for random access iterators too? In that case, I'm really unsure: I'm tempted by what Mitsuru is proposing, but I'm not 100% sure, not because of the 10% difference, but more importantly because we know well what we have got, nobody complained for so many years, and your change would be only a small tweak of it. Also, I know you are around to maintain it, which isn't a minor detail! In case, would you be willing to maintain Mitsuru's code too? Eventually, I think I will send both patches to the mailing list with my personal opinion, and I will ask.
