http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> --- Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. Kaz, are you planning to apply your patch, or do you want me to test it and commit it? I'm kicking off x86_64 tests with it right now, but I didn't get the failure on that target and don't have on hand yet a reproducer. Teresa On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:13 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Patch to change that bogus next_insn call to NEXT_INSN is preapproved, please > put these two PRs into the ChangeLog entry. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
