http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-07-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
If we have a straightforward explanation for why the very weird code isn't
causing problems, I think the fix almost qualifies as obvious, if properly
tested. Do we? Does it only amount to a small memory leak or a small buffer
overrun, something similar? In any case, yes, gcc-patches@ CC Jason Merrill
(there aren't *that* many C++ maintainers on gcc-patches named Jason ;)
