http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54310
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Ridge <zeratul976 at hotmail dot com> --- Richard Smith has suggested that GCC is actually allowed not to instantiate 'meta<int>' as per [temp.inst]/p6: "If the overload resolution process can determine the correct function to call without instantiating a class template definition, it is unspecified whether that instantiation actually takes place." If this is really what's happening - GCC is not instantiating 'meta<int>' because it can determine without doing so that the first overload of 'foo' will not be chosen - then I guess we can close this PR as INVALID.
