http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57819

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 30457
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30457&action=edit
gcc49-pr57819-2.patch

Alternative that touches only i386 backend.

In theory I think the simplify-rtx.c and combine.c changes are good and
desirable, perhaps even with what I've tried first - that
(zero_extend:SI (subreg:QI (and:DI (reg:DI) (const_int 63)) 0))
would be folded into
(subreg:SI (and:DI (reg:DI) (const_int 63)) 0)
But perhaps many backends will be surprised by that change and will need tweaks
here and there.  So any preferences here?  I can bootstrap/regtest both
patches...

Reply via email to