http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #2 from Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail dot com> 2013-04-30
10:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> No this change wasn't hastily nor wrong. Actual the change makes things
> compliant to logic already used for cygwin for years. Additional it fixed a
> quirk there was about eh-code sometimes not using shared version, if it actual
> was necessary to.
> The point is, if you want to avoid dependency to DLL libgcc version, then
> please use support static option for it. Otherwise you might get dependencies
> to the shared version, and there is nothing wrong about that.
>
> I admit that some functions might be added to shared version, which would be
> for pe-coff better be placed into the pure static part of libgcc. But well
> that is an enhancment issue and not a bug.
It's a regress to gcc 4.7, it't it ?
