http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56558
--- Comment #5 from Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau at connotech dot com> 2013-03-07 14:45:20 UTC --- paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56558 > > Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |DUPLICATE > > --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> > 2013-03-07 08:47:18 UTC --- > Indeed. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 48593 *** > Indeed, and thanks. I reported this bug (against 4.6 -- still supported by volunteers) because it *might* prevent the C++-converted gcc from being build with gcc in the range 3.x to 4.6. Working around bugs 48593 or 56558 is easy: get the pointer value through a reference declaration. The workaround may become a recommended coding style, with rationale being lost in the meantime. I don't know the terminology for gcc developers for applying a bug correction to an earlier version. So, I'm leaving it to you to determine if these bugs are relevant to 4.6 (and prior?) in view of the C++ conversion. Thanks and best regards,
