http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326



--- Comment #25 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-07 
00:08:26 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #24)

> (In reply to comment #22)

> > 4.8.0  -O2  (terminated after 9 minutes waiting, LIM being the offender, I

> > suspect domwalk ...)  >2.5GB

> > 

> > applying domwalk fix ...

> 

> It is LIM, for sure. I've been watching in GDB for a while at some

> back traces, and it's spent minutes already in this DOM walk:



After this, it's spending even more time in refs_independent_p, doing

bitmap tests (ah! a test case for my splay tree bitmaps!).



Is the refs_independent_p relation symmetric? It certainly looks that

way.  If so, one way to halve the work done here is to build only half

the "independence" graph.  Currently it builds a full square:



  if (mem_refs_may_alias_p (ref1->mem, ref2->mem,

                            &memory_accesses.ttae_cache))

    { 

      bitmap_set_bit (ref1->dep_ref, ref2->id);

      bitmap_set_bit (ref2->dep_ref, ref1->id);

      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))

        fprintf (dump_file, "dependent.\n");

      return false;

    }

  else

    {

      bitmap_set_bit (ref1->indep_ref, ref2->id);

      bitmap_set_bit (ref2->indep_ref, ref1->id);

      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))

        fprintf (dump_file, "independent.\n");

      return true;

    }



It's hard to say how much memory is wasted here (obstack_memory_used

is still broken and overflows), but it's probably x*100MB if not more.

Reply via email to