http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-06
12:01:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> All these regressions clutter the list of important regressions.
And why would all of these not be important?
Hiding a problem is not solving the problem.
And it always was policy that a regression should be marked as such. If
it is not important enough, you can set its priority to P4 or P5, but we
should never remove the regression marker.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-12/msg00550.html
