http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #18 from Tilo Schwarz <t...@tilo-schwarz.de> 2013-02-25 20:28:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > The type extension problem might be related to the fact, that gfortran does
> > not
> > generate a namelist entry for the implicit component %x of t1e_t:
> >
> > (no "t1e%x" below)
> >
> It is present...
>
> > _gfortran_st_set_nml_var (&dt_parm.1, &t1e.t1_t.x, &"t1e%t1_t%x"[1]{lb: 1
> > sz:
> > 1}, 4, 0, 24);
> >
> ... here.
Yes, somehow - but the code in list_read.c:find_nml_node() (as it is right now)
searches for the exact string "t1e%x", not for "t1e%t1_t%x".
I have no idea what is simpler:
- modify the code in list_read.c to somehow also search "t1e%t1_t%x", not only
"t1e%x". Maybe one could teach the code to conclude from the to namelist
entries
_gfortran_st_set_nml_var (&dt_parm.1, &t1e.t1_t, &"t1e%t1_t"...
_gfortran_st_set_nml_var (&dt_parm.1, &t1e.t1_t.x, &"t1e%t1_t%x"
that "t1e%x" is also valid a synonym of "t1e%t1_t%x".
or
- generate a line like
_gfortran_st_set_nml_var (&dt_parm.1, &t1e.t1_t.x, &"t1e%x" ...
