http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2013-02-18 19:15:43 UTC --- > ... > I would therefore suggest to resolve this PR by issuing a well-defined > error if we encounter a pipe on opening. Are you suggesting to "fix" the non working named pipes on Darwin by removing them everywhere? If yes, isn't it a little bit too radical? If there are pieces of code working only by chance, would not it be better to fix them?
