http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56337
Bug #: 56337 Summary: __attribute__((aligned(N))) allows too-high values of N Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: bro...@gcc.gnu.org This is a pretty minor thing, but consider the following .c file, which defines four arrays with very high alignments: float __attribute__((aligned(1<<25))) a[128]; float __attribute__((aligned(1<<26))) b[128]; float __attribute__((aligned(1<<27))) c[128]; float __attribute__((aligned(1<<28))) d[128]; For the smaller three alignments, the .comm directive in the assembly is correct. However, for the alignment of 1<<28, the alignment entry goes wildly wrong: $ i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -S align6.c -o- .file "align6.c" .comm d,512,4026531840 .comm c,512,134217728 .comm b,512,67108864 .comm a,512,33554432 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.8.0 20130131 (experimental)" .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits This is probably a pretty minor bug; it seems unlikely to arise in real practice. I'm only filing it because I expect the solution is likewise trivial -- if we try an alignment of 1<<29, we get an error of "requested alignment is too large". The threshold for this error merely needs to be lowered by a factor of two. This patch from H.J. Lu on bug 39323 appears to be the relevant code in gcc/config/elfos.h, although that hunk of the patch was never applied: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg01274.html