[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309



--- Comment #42 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2013-02-12 
14:41:56 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #41)



FYI, most of the codegen issues with xplor-nih compiled with gfortran can be

suppressed with -fno-tree-vectorize at -O3 (hence my interest in a function

libasan on darwin).