http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2013-01-30 22:20:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > A more structured version of the patch: After fixing the obvious syntax error > + If the label is not marked with a bb, assume it's the same bb. */ > + */ I tested this on x86_64-linux and sparc64-linux. On x86_64 there were no test suite changes, on sparc64 I got -FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56035.c (internal compiler error) -FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56035.c (test for excess errors) which is good, but I also got +FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/memtemp52.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) g++.log shows it failed due to an exit 1 from xg++, without diagnostic. Re-running that one test manually doesn't fail so I guess it was just a fluke.
