http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56156
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30
16:41:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Using an abstract interface is fine as one can use it as procedure pointer
I wanted to write "for proc-pointers". However, it can also be used as
proc-pointer, which should be also valid:
POINTER :: S
INTERFACE
SUBROUTINE S(X)
IMPORT :: T
TYPE(T) :: X
END SUBROUTINE S
END INTERFACE
