http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113



--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-28 
23:34:36 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #7)



With the patch from comment #7:



n=1000 6.18user 254976k maxresident

n=2000 16.76user 509184k maxresident

n=4000 54.23user 1432576l maxresident

n=8000 201.31user 1343296k maxresident



Without:

n=1000 6.45user 255616k maxresident

n=2000 17.65user 572096k maxresident

n=4000 55.10user 1485184k maxresident

n=8000 199.49user 1456000k maxresident



So there appears to be some small effect on memory footprint but

nothing to get excited about, and no effect on compile time.

Reply via email to