http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-29 16:40:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Although I agree with Mikael that gfortran should probably > not have a NULL symtree by the time we reach gfc_conv_function_expr, > the above patch regression tests cleanly. Indeed, it's probably not that bad actually, as value.function.esym is properly set, despite symtree being NULL. Regarding: (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not > familiar with the internals for CLASS, so the > change to class.c may need some additional work. > That change is certainly OK: If e->symtree == NULL, it doesn't make sense to have subreferences (e->ref == NULL), so the function reduces to a no-op.
