http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-26 17:56:31 UTC --- This is another result of the underlying bug unearthed in PR54990. Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c =================================================================== *** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 194721) --- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy) *************** static tree *** 3099,3112 **** build_array_ref (tree desc, tree offset, tree decl) { tree tmp; /* Class array references need special treatment because the assigned type size needs to be used to point to the element. */ if (GFC_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (desc)) && TREE_CODE (desc) == COMPONENT_REF ! && GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (desc, 0)))) { ! tree type = gfc_get_element_type (TREE_TYPE (desc)); tmp = TREE_OPERAND (desc, 0); tmp = gfc_get_class_array_ref (offset, tmp); tmp = fold_convert (build_pointer_type (type), tmp); --- 3099,3118 ---- build_array_ref (tree desc, tree offset, tree decl) { tree tmp; + tree type; + + type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (desc, 0)); + if (TYPE_CANONICAL (type) + && GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (TYPE_CANONICAL (type))) + type = TYPE_CANONICAL (type); /* Class array references need special treatment because the assigned type size needs to be used to point to the element. */ if (GFC_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (desc)) && TREE_CODE (desc) == COMPONENT_REF ! && GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (type)) { ! type = gfc_get_element_type (TREE_TYPE (desc)); tmp = TREE_OPERAND (desc, 0); tmp = gfc_get_class_array_ref (offset, tmp); tmp = fold_convert (build_pointer_type (type), tmp); fixes it. As remarked in PR54990, I do not know why this regression has occurred. Evidently, GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P is not being transferred from the canonical type, whereas this was happening before the regression (or a new type was not being generated?). I will investigate more. I have taken this PR. Cheers Paul